by Fredrick Agboma
Comment
9/09/26
Students are not disengaged, they are adapting to a thinner university
For Fredrick Agboma and Andrew Doyle, the question isn't whether students are less committed, but what culture they're asked to inhabit
by Fredrick Agboma
Comment
9/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Author 1 ? 's' : '')?> -->
Wonkhe-Fredrick-Agboma
Fredrick Agboma
Senior Lecturer
by David Kernohan
staff
16/06/26
Fredrick Agboma is a Senior Lecturer at Liverpool John Moores University
Wonkhe-Andrew-Doyle
Andrew Doyle
Associate Dean
by David Kernohan
staff
16/06/26
Andrew Doyle is Associate Dean of Education and Student Experience at Liverpool John Moores University
Tags --> Tags
Student engagement
Students
Fredrick Agboma Fredrick Agboma is a Senior Lecturer at Liverpool John Moores University
Tags
Student engagement
Students
Andrew Doyle Andrew Doyle is Associate Dean of Education and Student Experience at Liverpool John Moores University
Universities are increasingly worried about student engagement.
Students are attending less, reading less, participating less, and often treating university as one commitment among many.
At the same time, compressed timetables, lecture capture, flexible delivery and two-day degree models all respond to the economic and personal pressures students face.
Two day degree courses are a striking example: campus teaching that is concentrated into two consecutive days a week so students can balance study with work, caring responsibilities and commuting. For many students, flexibility is not a preference but a condition of participation.
But if universities increasingly teach students that higher education should fit around life, work and employability, should we really be surprised when students begin treating it instrumentally?
This is not a nostalgic argument for a lost era of full lecture theatres and five-day campus immersion. Many students are navigating financial pressure, caring responsibilities, long commutes, paid work and complex lives.
The question is not whether students are less committed. It is what kind of university culture they are being asked to inhabit.
Thick versus thin
A “thick” university culture does more than deliver teaching.
It inducts students into rhythms, relationships, expectations and identities. It creates repeated encounters with people, ideas and practices that make learning feel like something worth organising life around.
But thick cultures have not always been equally accessible. The argument is not restoration, as if the traditional residential model worked well for everyone. It is reinvention: how might universities create richer cultures of learning for students whose lives no longer fit older assumptions about time, place, and participation?
A “thin” university culture, by contrast, is one in which participation can be demonstrated without deep attachment. Students can attend enough, submit enough, log in enough and collect enough credits while remaining weakly connected to the identity of being a learner.
That thinness is rarely intentional.
Lecture capture improves accessibility. Flexible delivery supports participation. Compressed timetables help students manage work and commuting. Employability activity responds to anxieties about graduate futures.
Individually, these developments make sense. Collectively, they communicate something about the role university is expected to play in students’ lives. The policy task is not to choose between flexibility and depth, but to design flexible provision that still creates rhythm, relationship and repeated intellectual encounter.
Choose your own engagement story
A timetable compressed into two days may solve an access problem while creating an identity problem. It can unintentionally suggest that higher education is something to batch, consume efficiently and fit around other priorities.
For many students, engagement decisions are no longer purely educational decisions. They are economic decisions. A two-hour seminar may contribute indirectly to long-term development, employability or intellectual growth. But a two-hour work shift may pay for food, transport or rent this week.
The 2025 Student Academic Experience Survey reported that 68 per cent of students undertake paid work during term time , a 12 percentage point increase from 2024. It also reported that independent study time had fallen from 13.6 hours per week in 2024 to 11.6 hours in 2025.
That reflects more than poor time management. Higher education’s rewards are increasingly delayed, uncertain, and debt-financed, while paid work is immediate and tangible. Under those conditions, selective engagement can look less like disengagement and more like rational prioritisation.
If universities want sustained engagement, they need to examine the choices their designs make rational. That means looking at the whole student week, not only scheduled contact hours: where preparation, feedback, peer learning, commuting, employment and recovery actually fit.
This is why the medium matters. Universities often treat timetables, lecture capture, virtual environments, assessment patterns and attendance systems as delivery mechanisms. But they are also meaning-making systems.
The timetable teaches students how often university expects to matter. The virtual learning environment teaches whether learning is a live practice or a resource archive. Lecture capture teaches whether presence is essential or optional. Assessment patterns teach whether learning is cumulative or episodic. Employability messaging teaches whether knowledge has value in itself or mainly when converted into labour-market advantage.
What did you imagine?
This may explain why some engagement debates feel unsatisfactory.
Universities often measure engagement through visible behaviours: attendance, logins, submissions, continuation and survey responses. But these measures tell us whether students are moving through the system, not necessarily whether they are being formed by it.
What sometimes appears as disengagement may be better understood as immobilised participation. Students remain operationally present while becoming educationally distant. They are present in the thinnest possible sense, but not necessarily held by a thick culture of study.
That thinness also matters for belonging. Belonging is not generated by welcome activities, dashboards, campaigns or occasional community events alone. It emerges through sustained participation in a culture where students repeatedly encounter the people, practices and expectations that allow them to see themselves as learners.
For some students, there is now a gap between the university they imagined and the university they encounter. They may arrive expecting higher education to be developmental and transformative, only to find themselves managing study as one obligation among many in a system organised around flexibility, efficiency and employability.
The institutional question is not only whether students have attended, logged in or submitted. It is whether the design of the course has made it possible for them to build a learner identity over time.
Spinning broken records
The challenge is not to remove flexibility or return to an older model of higher education that was inaccessible for many students. The challenge is to ask what our institutional arrangements are teaching students about the meaning of learning.
We spend enormous amounts of time auditing the formal curriculum: learning outcomes, assessment criteria, skills mapping, continuation data and graduate outcomes. We spend far less time auditing the symbolic curriculum.
What does the timetable teach students about the place of study in their lives? What does employability messaging teach about the purpose of higher education? What does lecture capture teach about presence? What do attendance systems teach about trust? What do student experience metrics teach about satisfaction and education? And what does it teach students when we measure their satisfaction before they have had enough time to understand what they have learned?
Practical responses might begin with smaller, deliberate moves: protecting time for sustained intellectual encounter rather than content delivery; building assessment patterns that reward cumulative engagement rather than episodic compliance; reviewing what employability messaging teaches students about the value of what they are studying; and asking whether engagement metrics are picking up formation or only motion.
The point is not another initiative. It is to read our existing arrangements as a curriculum in their own right.
Students are not simply disengaged. Many are adapting intelligently and rationally to the university we have designed around them.
When higher education is organised around flexibility, employability, platforms, metrics and economic survival, students learn to treat study as one obligation among many rather than a central formative practice.
The challenge is not to shame students back into engagement. It is to build forms of higher education thick enough to compete with the economic and psychological pressures that increasingly shape student life.
-->
Share
Click to print (Opens in new window)
Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
icon-comments
icon-share
-->
Share
Click to print (Opens in new window)
Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
research a research agenda
-->
rawonkhead916x17502x
View here
by Mark Leach
featured message
19/05/23
making sense SLOLS 26 side green
-->
MSoHE_blog_banner_1000x1680@2x
View here
by Mark Leach
featured message
18/01/24
post list Latest articles Latest articles -->
Image: Shutterstock
Before we ask students to belong, we should ask where
by Billy Wong
Comment
22/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Why has the OfS downgraded graduate outcomes?
by Stephen Isherwood
Comment
22/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
It turns out the English higher education market is pretty strange
by David Kernohan
Comment
21/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Why international recruitment keeps chasing the wrong markets
by Annie Bell
Comment
21/09/26
Podcast: Loans, Free speech
by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
18/09/26
wonkhe-squeeze-shapes-fit
Counting the cost of teaching higher education in England
by David Kernohan
Policy Watch
18/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
What does student safety mean in a more hostile world?
by Cynthia Keza Birikundavyi
Comment
18/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Programme coherence is everyone’s responsibility
by Soheil Davari
Comment
18/09/26
Image: Hugh Jones
Higher education postcard: South East Technological University, Ireland
by Hugh Jones
Comment
18/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Universities must be partners in the devolution agenda
by Luke Green
Comment
17/09/26
Subscribe
Notify of
new follow-up comments new replies to my comments
Label
Name*
Email*
Website
Δ
Label
Name*
Email*
Website
Δ
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mary
12 days ago
>>Employability activity responds to anxieties about graduate futures.
I’d argue that employability done right does far more than this — it should be exactly the place where we ask students to think about their identities and their motivations, to consider the value that society puts on higher education and the value that they personally put on it, and to articulate the role that studying plays in the totality of their experiences. Good employability activities, supported by qualified careers practitioners, should create spaces where students can answer these questions for themselves, reflect on their own motivations and reasons for pursuing academic study and co-create the university around them.
Reply
Fred
12 days ago
Reply to
Mary
Thank you Mary – this is a useful challenge, and I think it strengthens the argument rather than cutting against it.
The piece is taking aim at employability in its thin, instrumental form: the messaging that quietly teaches students that the point of a degree is mainly its conversion into outcomes, metrics or labour-market value. What you are describing is almost the opposite – employability as a space where students are invited to ask what their education is for, what they value, and who they are becoming through it.
That is not a rebuttal of the thin university; it is exactly the kind of thickening the piece is calling for.
If anything, you have named something the article underplayed. By referring to “employability messaging,” we risked lumping reflective careers practice in with the more reductive version. Good careers practice, led by qualified practitioners, can be one of the important places where formation happens.
The distinction I would hold onto is this: the problem is not employability itself, but whether it narrows education to an outcome, or opens up space for students to do the harder work of deciding what studying means to them. On that, I think we agree.
Reply
Mary
8 days ago
Reply to
Fred
I definitely agree with that!
Reply
Related articles
Image: Midjourney
A Washington fraternity ruling exposes the gap in England’s duty of care law
by Robert Abrahart
Comment
16/09/26
Image: Midjourney
We need to talk about mobility
by Jim Dickinson
Comment
15/09/26
Image: Midjourney
OfS wants students to complain more. AI is about to oblige
by Jim Dickinson
Comment
11/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
Student protection needs to start with what closure actually feels like
by Charlotte Corrish
Comment
8/09/26
Image: Midjourney
Are students as lucky to be here as they feel?
by Jim Dickinson
Comment
1/09/26
Image: Shutterstock
There’s a student-shaped hole in Scotland’s funding gap. Here’s how to fill it
by Jim Dickinson
Comment
31/08/26
Image: Midjourney
There’s 104 days of summer vacation and school comes along just to end that
by Sharanya Sivarajah
Comment
28/08/26
Image: Shutterstock
Budgets are shrinking but the cost of living gap still needs closing
by Liz Mossop
Comment
21/08/26